Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 Md. App. 666 - McDowell v. State

179 Md. App. 666 - McDowell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Long dissenters assume that limitation (ii) [that the search for weapons must be limited to areas in which a weapon may be placed or hidden] does not prohibit search of containers in the car, and that would seem to be correct. But whether it always allows search of a container large enough to contain a weapon is unclear. For one thing, the Court in Long had no occasion to consider whether, if the container is soft, a “pat-down” of it and discovery of a hard object within are prerequisites to search into the container, just as is true of search of the suspect’s person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a standard gym bag, two and a half feet by a foot and a half,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.