Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 MISC 536 - People v. Eklof

People v. Eklof’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 1974
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1974

7 state decisions

301942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burton v. United States · Cross v. State of North Carolina · People Ex Rel. Brinkman v. Barr · Hartung v. . the People · People Ex Rel. Liss v. Superintendent of Women's Prison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is also provided in section 139 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: ‘When an act charged as a crime is within the jurisdiction of another state, territory or country, as well as within the jurisdiction of this state, a conviction or acquittal thereof in the former, is a bar to a prosecution or indictment therefor in this state.’ “Section 33 of the Penal Law provides that when an offense is committed in a foreign jurisdiction under circumstances under which the courts of this State have jurisdiction, and the defendant has already been acquitted or convicted on the merits upon a criminal prosecution under the laws of such State or country, such former acquittal or conviction is a sufficient defense. “The motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of double jeopardy is therefore granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.