¶1 The pertinent and controlling facts in this case are substantially the same as those of Wittson v. Dowling, ante, 542, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment for plaintiff enforcing the contract of purchase is
¶2 Affirmed.
179 N.C. 682
103 S.E 20
Thies v. . Tanner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 12, 1920
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1920-05-12
<p>CONTROVERSY without action, heard before Lane, J., at March Term, 1920, of MecKLEnburo.</p>
Decided 1920-05-12