Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 N.C. App. 1 - State v. Hill

179 N.C. App. 1 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Dunn v. United States · State v. Smith · State v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellate review is limited to those questions “clearly” defined and “presented to the reviewing court” in the parties’ briefs, in which “arguments and authorities upon which the parties rely in support of their respective positions” are to be presented. See N.C.R. App. P. 28(a)[.]... “It is not the role of the appellate courts ... to create an appeal for an appellant,” nor is it “the duty of the appellate courts to supplement an appellant’s brief with legal authority or arguments not contained therein.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not the role of the appellate courts . . . to create an appeal for an appellant,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “considering the totality of the circumstances at the time of performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.