179 N.C. App. 30 - State v. Hart’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty · State v. Hennis · State v. Harvey · Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“4. The trial court erred in overruling defendant’s objection as to the officer’s testimony that certain evidence constituted a “crack pipe”, as such testimony constituted an opinion as to an ultimate issue for the jury and a legal conclusion, otherwise violated the N.C. Rules of Evidence, and denied defendant due process, a fair trial and his legal and constitutional rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“our Supreme Court recently reversed per curiam Munn v. North Carolina State University, 173 N.C. App. 144 , 617 S.E.2d 335 (2005) for the reasons stated in Judge Jackson’s dissenting opinion. Munn v. North Carolina State University, 360 N.C. 353, 354 , 626 S.E.2d 270, 271 (2006). In her opinion, Judge Jackson cited State v. Buchanan, 170 N.C. App. 692, 693 [], 613 S.E.2d 356, 357 (2005) for the proposition, “Our Supreme Court has stated that this Court may not review an appeal that violates the Rules of Appellate Procedure even though such violations neither impede our comprehension of the issues nor frustrate the appellate process.” (Emphasis added). Thus, by reversing for the reasons stated in Judge Jackson’s dissent, our Supreme Court has directly spoken on this issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“On 13 May 2005, a jury returned a verdict finding defendant guilty of all three offenses. Defendant then pled guilty to attaining the status of an habitual felon. The trial court sentenced him to a minimum of 151 months and a maximum of 191 months in the custody of the North Carolina Department of Correction. Defendant appealed the judgment. This Court dismissed one of several assignments of error (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.