179 N.C. App. 402 - Carroll v. Ferro’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “) claim, $8,000 plus interest, and $8,000 in liquidated damages for his unpaid wages claim. In addition, the arbitrator's award included an alternative award against Ferro in the amount of $876,408 for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. On 28 March 2005, plaintiff filed an application to confirm the award. Defendants filed a motion to vacate, or in the alternative, to modify or correct the arbitration award. On 28 July 2005, the Honorable Timothy L. Patti (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Carroll v. Ferro

2. “under the law of the case, the court's order was a modification and not a vacatur. Therefore, we review the Post-Appeal Order to determine whether the trial court erred in modifying the award. III. Analysis A. Modification of Arbitration Award We note that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Carroll v. Ferro

3. “Carroll may only recover from the Arbitration Defendants, collectively, the principal sum of $1,000,000.00, with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date of entry of this Order until paid in full.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Carroll v. Ferro