Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 N.C. App. 710 - State v. Wallace

179 N.C. App. 710 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · State v. Hartness · State v. Stancil · State v. Coker · State v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he reasoning our Supreme Court set forth in Lawrence may be imputed to sexual offense charges because: (1) N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15-144.2 (a) authorizes, for sexual offense, an abbreviated form of indictment which omits allegations of the particular elements that distinguish first-degree and second-degree sexual offense[;] and (2) if a defendant wishes additional information in the nature of the specific "sexual act" with which he stands charged, he may move for a bill of particulars.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen ruling on a motion to dismiss, the trial court must decide whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and (2) of defendant’s being the perpetrator of such offense. If so, the motion is properly denied. Evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of all reasonable inferences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.