179 Ohio App. 3d 14 - Dill v. Dill’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · Berish v. Berish · 93 Ohio App. 3d 653 - Gullia v. Gullia · 40 Ohio App. 3d 155 - Day v. Day · 70 Ohio App. 3d 738 - Connolly v. Connolly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the court determines that the use of [the final hearing date] would be inequitable, the court may select dates that it considers equitable in determining marital property. If the court selects dates that it considers equitable in determining marital property, 'during the marriage' means the period of time between those dates selected and specified by the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the date of the final hearing would be inequitable and that a de facto termination of the marriage occurred at an earlier time, the trial court has the discretion to select dates that it considers equitable[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Roberts“No one factor is dispositive; rather, the trial court must determine the relative equities on a caseby-case basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.