Hurst v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The foregoing section of the statute does not apply to contracts of sale, barter, and exchange, nor to contracts for service or hire. Alder v. Chapman, 91 Okla. 196 , 219 P. 90 . It applies only to contracts for the loan of money. National Novelty Import Co. v. Muncy, 93 Okla. 5 , 219 P. 669 . The record being silent as to the nature of the contract sued upon, this court will not presume that the contract was one for the loan of money. Inasmuch as defendants contend that the lack of the nonusury affidavit renders the judgment void, the burden is upon them to show that the nature of the suit or action brings it within the purview of section 9522, supra (Simmons v. McLennan, 101 Okla. 98 , 223 P. 677 ); this the defendants have wholly failed to do.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Rees v. Brown