Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lipschultz v. Lipschultz’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably 327 Pa. Super. 326 - Prozzoly v. Prozzoly (1984), 230 Pa. Super. 125 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Halderman v. Halderman (1974)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 162 Pa. Super. 227 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pinkenson v. Pinkenson · 177 Pa. Super. 384 - Hanson v. Hanson · 177 Pa. Super. 122 - Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. Rovner · 161 Pa. Super. 529 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Arbitman v. Arbitman · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Van Wagenen v. Van Wagenen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our duty on this appeal is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the order of the hearing judge. Commonwealth ex rel. Rovner v. Rovner, 177 Pa.Super. 122 , 111 A.2d 160 . The burden is upon a wife, who has withdrawn from the martial domicile, to prove that her husband’s conduct justified her leaving him or that he consented to the separation. Commonwealth ex rel. Arbitman v. Arbitman, 161 Pa.Super. 529 , 55 A.2d 586 . A voluntary withdrawal by the wife without adequate legal reason defeats her right to support. Commonwealth ex rel. Pinkenson v. Pinkenson, 162 Pa.Super. 227 , 57 A.2d 720 .... The mere allegation that cohabitation is unbearable, unsupported by facts or reasons, is not sufficient. Commonwealth v. Popkin, 165 Pa.Super. 489 , 69 A.2d 160 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.