Phillips v. Albrecht’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bearman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. · Saucier v. McLean · C. C. Elmer Tank Boiler Co. v. Art Cleaner & Dyers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In regard to the consideration of evidence offered in other cases between other parties in support of issues presented in the instant case, it is sufficient to say that we do not take judicial cognizance of such records.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.