Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 So. 2d 433 - Smith v. Smith

179 So. 2d 433 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 1981
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1981

10 state decisions

40196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilmot v. Wilmot · Cotton v. Wright · Thornton v. Floyd · State Ex Rel. Simpson v. Salter · Hillard v. Hillard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If a final judgment in the first suit would be res judicata of the second, the exception of lis pendens is well pleaded.” 179 So.2d 435 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.