Rhoden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2000
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Haddock v. State · O'Berry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to a * * * trial, by an impartial jury, in the county where the crime was committed * * *.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Section 11, Declaration of Rights, does not afford any change of venue, nor does the constitution elsewhere provide for such change and therefore a statute authorizing a deviation from the constitutional guarantee should be strictly construed and the constitutional right set forth in § 11, Declaration of Rights, jealously guarded. Nothing should be left to presumption.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n all criminal prosecutions the trial shall be in the county where the offense was committed unless otherwise provided by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.