179 SO2D 673 - Viser v. Viser

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1985

8 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Love, Rigby, & Donovan, Shreveport, for appellant.

¶2Leroy H. Scott, Jr., Shreveport, for appellee.

¶3Before HARDY, GLADNEY and BOLIN, JJ.

¶4GLADNEY, Judge.

¶5This appeal is from a judgment denying appellant, Harry L. Viser, revocation or suspension of a decree of the trial court rendered March 31, 1965 ordering the payment of alimony pendente lite. The relief sought by appellant is predicated on inability to obtain employment. The issues *674 raised therein are entirely of a factual nature.

¶6A judgment was rendered on March 31, 1965, ordering defendant, Harry L. Viser, to pay to his wife, Louise Powell Viser, $300.00 per month as alimony pendente lite. The defendant appealed from that judgment and the review thereof by this court has been decided in Viser v. Viser, 179 So.2d 672, No. 10,427 on the docket of this court this day decided.

¶7We are of the opinion that the issues raised by this appeal are governed by our decision in case No. 10,427, wherein we held the matter presented and decided by the trial court was discretionary and there was no abuse of authority by the trial judge.

¶8For the reasons assigned the judgment is affirmed at appellant's cost.