Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 SO3D 1218 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · 728 So. 2d 568 - Berry v. State · Puckett v. State · Randall v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Jury instructions are generally within the discretion of the trial court, and the settled standard of review is abuse of discretion. The instructions are to be read together as a whole, with no one instruction to be read alone or taken out of context. When read together, if the jury instructions fairly state the law of the case and create no injustice, then no reversible error will be found[.] A defendant is entitled to have jury instructions given which present his theory' of the case; however, this entitlement is limited in that the trial court may refuse an instruction which incorrectly states the law, is covered fairly elsewhere in the instructions, or is without foundation in the évidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.