Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 SW3D 117 - State v. Ford

State v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · Romero v. State · La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of Mercedes · City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News · State v. Moff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “two components[,] stated in the conjunctive: information to which the public does not generally have access; and that is prohibited from disclosure under the Open Records Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any information to which the public does not generally have access, and that is prohibited from disclosure under [the Texas Public Information Act].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “information . . . which has not been made public,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.