¶1 ORDER
¶2 Walter Warren (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point relied on, Movant argues that the motion court erred when it denied Movant’s post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that he entered the plea only after the plea court advised him that he was entitled to credit for the time he had served while in custody on the charge. Since he did not receive credit for time served, Movant ar *306 gues that his plea was not voluntary. We find no error and affirm.
¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).