Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 SW3D 343 - Coday v. State

Coday v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Sanders v. State · State v. Tokar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statements of one conspirator are admissible against another under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, even when the conspirators are not charged with conspiracy. Coday argues that this hearsay exception does not apply because Victim’s murder had already been committed when the conversation between Greathouse and Coday occurred. If a conspiracy continues for any purpose, however, statements made after the commission of the crime are still admissible pursuant to this exception to the hearsay rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Counsel's failure to object to cumulative evidence, even where the trial court would have sustained the objection, does not result in prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.