Coday v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States · Sanders v. State · State v. Tokar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Statements of one conspirator are admissible against another under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, even when the conspirators are not charged with conspiracy. Coday argues that this hearsay exception does not apply because Victim’s murder had already been committed when the conversation between Greathouse and Coday occurred. If a conspiracy continues for any purpose, however, statements made after the commission of the crime are still admissible pursuant to this exception to the hearsay rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McFarland“Counsel's failure to object to cumulative evidence, even where the trial court would have sustained the objection, does not result in prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Polk v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.