Denny v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tooley v. State · Wallingford v. State · Blanton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he record must disclose that the omission of a signature was called to the attention of the attorney or party to permit its prompt correction before a filing may be stricken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] party is allowed to utilize this provision regardless of how much time elapses before the deficiency is called to his or her attention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“this is not an opportunity for Mr. Denny to amend his motion in any manner”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.