Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 U.S. 270 - Williams v. Fears

Williams v. Fears’s Empirical Analysis

179 U.S. 270 · 1900

Citation profile

397
cited by 397 later decisions
66
cited 66 times by the Supreme Court
36
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 40 district · 130 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 397 later decisions (66 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Dunn v. Blumstein (1972), City of Chicago v. Morales (1999)

67 federal appellate · 40 district · 130 state decisions — followed in 36 states

6101900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paul v. Virginia · Allgeyer v. State of Louisiana · Holden v. Hardy · Hooper v. People of State of California · County of Mobile v. Kimball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 397 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “right to remove from one place to another according to inclination”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It would seem, moreover, that the busines sitself is of such a nature and importance as to justify the exercise of the police power in its regulation.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““And so as to the right to contract. The liberty, of which the deprivation without due process of law is forbidden, ‘means not only the right of the citizen to be free from the mere physical restraint of his person, as by incarceration, but the term is deemed to embrace the right of the citizen to be free in the enjoyment of all his faculties, to be free to use them in all lawful ways, to live and work where he will, to earn his livelihood by any lawful calling, to pursue any livelihood or avocation, and for that purpose to enter into all contracts which may be proper, necessary, and essential to his carrying out to a successful conclusion the purposes above mentioned.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.