State v. Kipp’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Caceres · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of Washington · 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall not be unlawful for a law enforcement officer acting in the performance of the officer’s official duties to intercept, record, or disclose an oral communication or conversation where the officer is a party to the communication or conversa tion or one of the parties to the communication or conversation has given prior consent to the interception, recording, or disclosure: PROVIDED, That prior to the interception, transmission, or recording the officer shall obtain written or telephonic authorization from a judge or magistrate, who shall approve the interception, recording, or disclosure of communications or conversations with a nonconsenting party for a reasonable and specified period of time, if there is probable cause to believe that the nonconsenting party has committed, is engaged in, or is about to commit a felony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'belonging to oneself ... SECRET ... intended only for the persons involved (a ~ conversation) ... holding a confidential relationship to something ... a secret message: a private communication ... SECRETLY : not open or in public.' " Kipp , 179 Wash.2d at 729 , 317 P.3d 1029 (quoting WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 1804-05 (1969) ) (alterations in original); Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police Dep't , 119 Wash.2d 178 , 190, 829 P.2d 1061 (1992). ¶ 26 Here, Racus thought he was texting "Kristl.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Racus“[plrivate communication transmitted by telephone, telegraph, radio, or other device between two or more individuals between points within or without the state by any device electronic or otherwise designed to record and/or transmit said communication regardless how such device is powered or actuated, without first obtaining the consent of all the participants in the communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.