Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 179 WASH2D 862 - State v. Hinton

State v. Hinton’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · Olmstead v. United States · United States v. Salvucci · Lopez v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are mindful that today's mobile devices often contain 'a "wealth of detail about [a person's] familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “falls within one ofthe jealously guarded and carefully drawn exceptions to the warrant requirement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'the nature and extent of the information which may be obtained as a result of the government conduct' and at the historical treatment of the interest asserted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.