¶1The reception of the confession, obtained upon questioning by police officers while defendant was in jail, after he had been arraigned and held to answer and before he first had counsel, constituted prejudicial error requiring reversal. (People v. Meyer, 11 N Y 2d 162, 164-165; People v. Rodriguez, 11 N Y 2d 279, 285.) Appellant’s additional contention is untenable, particularly so since that part of the delay in furnishing stenographic minutes that ensued after the decision of appellant’s motion (15 A D 2d 989) cannot be accounted unreasonable under the circumstances shown at that time. Judgment reversed, upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.
18 A.D.2d 739
People v. Price
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 28, 1962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1962-12-28
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1964
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1962-12-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →