Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 ALA 288 - Wilkinson v. Moseley

Wilkinson v. Moseley’s Empirical Analysis

1850

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Vines v. Crescent Transit Company (1955), Mobile Life Insurance v. Randall (1883)

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

9018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Perhaps the best criterion is this: if the cause of action, as stated in the declaration, arises from a breach of promise, the action is ex contractu; but if the cause of action arises from a breach of duty growing out of the contract, it is in form ex delicto, and case.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the declaration allege the hiring of a horse to ride to a certain place, and that the defendant rode him so immoderately that he died, this would be case; for the contract of hiring imposed upon him the duty to ride in reason, or not unreasonably fast. But, if the declaration allege the hiring, and that he promised to ride with reasonable speed, but, not regarding his promise, he rode the horse immoderately, whereby he died, the action may be considered assumpsit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.