Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Ala. App. 322 - Wade v. State

18 Ala. App. 322 - Wade v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 1959
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1959

12 state decisions

801921193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parsons v. State · Woodson v. State · Wade v. State · McGehee v. State · Ex Parte Empire Clothing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After the jury was organized, and in the presence of the jury, the court made the following statement: Before the taking of testimony began, the court made the following statement. ‘Now the nature of this case is such, as I understand, that the court is called upon to exercise its discretion about parties remaining in the courtroom during the evidence, and the court believes that it will be best for the public interest to exclude all parties except relatives of those concerned, the attorneys and officers of the court. Therefore I will have to require all parties be excluded from the courtroom during the taking of the testimony in this case, except those who are related, those who are officers of the court, either as attorneys or- officers whose duty it may be to come in during the course of the trial.’ ” 18 Ala. App. 322 , 92 South. 97 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.