Ramsey v. State

Decided January 31, 1922

Alabama Court of Appeals · decided 1922-01-31

A. Steele, Judge. John Ramsey was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. The bill of exceptions should.be stricken. Sections 3019 and 3022, Code 1907. In the absence of the bill of exceptions, the court will not review charges refused. 73 South. 748.

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1927

5 state decisions

Relies on 15 Ala. App. 379 - Moran v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1922-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MERRITT, J.

¶1 [1] The motion of the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions in this cause must prevail. The record shows that it was not approved within 90 days from the date it was presented. Sections 3019 and 3020, Code 1907. The ’ appellant was convicted under a complaint which charged him with larceny, and with buying, concealing, receiving,-, or aiding in concealing stolen' property. >-

¶2 [2] There being no bill of exceptions, we will not review the action of the trial court in refusing certain written instructions requested by the defendant. Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 South. 748, 13 Mich. Digest, p. 795, § 712. We have examined the record and find no reversible error.

¶3 The judgment appealed from must therefore be affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.