P. Heflin, Judge. E. C. Bradford was convicted for failing or refusing to dip tick-infested cattle, and he appeals. The court erred in overruling demurrers to the affidavit and in refusing the charges requested. 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883.
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1925
¶1
On appeal from the Jefferson county court of misdemeanor, to the circuit court, the defendant was convicted under a complaint which charged that he failed to dip his cattle after being warned to do so.
¶2*402
[1]
There are certain demurrers set out in the record, but the judgment entry does not recite that they were presented to, considered, or acted upon by the court, and, this being true, this court cannot consider them. Birmingham, E. & B. R. R. Co. v. Hoskins, 14 Ala. App. 254, 69 South. 339; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 460, 73 South. 830.
¶3
However, the questions raised by the demurrers have been decided adversely to the defendant in the case of Williams v. State ante, p. 83, 89 South. 97.
