Vaughan v. State

<p>1. Criminal law <&wkey;lll6 — No review of ruling on demurrer, in absence of showing of ruling.</p> <p>Where the indictment was demurred to, but the judgment failed to show any ruling on demurrer, there is nothing for the appellate court to pass on.</p> <p>2. Criminal law t&wkey;| 144(3)— Overruling motion to quash presumed proper, in absence of motion.</p> <p>Where judgment shows a ruling on a motion to quash the indictment, but no motion to quash appears in the record, the appellate court wiE presume that the court’s action on the motion was without error.</p> <p>3. Criminal law <§=s>364(3) — Statement of defendant when arrested admissible as res gestee.</p> <p>In prosecution for manufacturing liquor, it was not error to admit testimony of witness to statement made by defendant at the still at the time the arrest was made; it being a part of the res gestae.</p> <p>4. Criminal law <@=373 — Crime of manufacturing liquor is continuous in nature, and evidence of other runs is admissible.</p> <p>The crime of manufacturing liquor is continuous in its nature, and when referring to the same still and location, proof of other runs having been made would be competent to establish the offense.</p>