Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 ARIZ 491 - Yaen v. State

Yaen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1919
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pearce v. Foote · Leonard v. . Poole · Bobo v. State · Wortham v. State · Woods v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If this is such a case as the law requires a preliminary examination to be had before a magistrate prior to the filing of an information, the failure to make such examination is not a ground for demurrer, but is a ground for a motion to quash the proceedings and abate the action. If the examination was or was not a necessary step in the proceedings, certainly such step need not be alleged on the face of the information. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.