Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Ariz. 535

Hammond v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1917

Arizona Supreme Court · decided 1917-04-18

<p>Criminal Law — Appeal and Error — Failure to Set Out Evidence— Extent of Review. — Where accused submitted cause on judgment-roll forming transcript on appeal with no record of evidence, made no appearance by argument or brief, the judgment will be affirmed, where it does not appear that any substantial right has been denied.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1917-04-18

PEE CUBIAM.

¶1Information for violating the prohibition amendment to the Constitution, and an appeal from the judgment of conviction and order overruling his motion for a new trial.

¶2The cause is submitted to this court on the judgment-roll forming the transcript on appeal. The evidence is not in the record. The appellant makes no appearance and gives no *536assistance to the court by way of argument, brief, or assignment of errors. The record has been examined for fundamental error, and we fail to find that any substantial right of the appellant has been denied.

¶3The judgment and order must be, and are therefore, affirmed.

/18/ariz/535 · .json · Public domain