Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Ark. App. 243 - Shaw v. State

18 Ark. App. 243 - Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably Cox v. State (1989), Cox v. Al Lockhart (1992)

27 state decisions

170198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chandler v. State · Harkness v. Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All excluded periods shall be set forth by the court in a written order or docket entry. The number of days of the excluded period or periods shall be added to the number of months applicable to the defendant as set forth in Rule 28.1(a), (b) and (c) to determine the limitations and consequences applicable to the defendant.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cox v. State · Gooden v. State
  2. “Any defendant charged with an offense in circuit court ... shall be entitled to have the charge dismissed with an absolute bar to prosecution if not brought to trial within eighteen (18) months from the time provided in Rule 28.2, excluding only such periods of necessary delay as are authorized in Rule 28.3.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cox v. State
  3. “not contain any written order or docket entry setting forth the excluded periods or the number of days in each period.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Cox v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.