Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 ARKAPP 64 - Flurry v. State

Flurry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · Harris v. State · Caton v. State · Judge v. State · Westbrook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the case at bar, it is not questioned that the prosecutrix’s testimony is sufficient to sustain. The verdict of assault with intent to rape. However, the jury has the sole prerogative to accept all or any part of a witness’ testimony whether controverted or not. Therefore, the jury had the absolute right, as trier of facts, to evaluate the evidence and consider whether only an unlawful assault was committed upon her by appellant or even acquit him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.