Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 BR 566 - In Re Petro

In Re Petro’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

1501982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1307 · 11 U.S.C. § 349

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) unreasonable delay by the debtor that is prejudicial to creditors; (2) nonpayment of any fees and charges required under chapter 123 of title 28; (3) failure to file a plan timely under section 1321 of this title; (4) denial of confirmation of a plan under section 1325 of this title and denial of additional time for filing another plan or a modification of a plan; (5) material default by the debtor with respect to a term of a confirmed plan; (6) revocation of the order of confirmation under section 1330 of this title, and denial of confirmation of a modified plan under section 1329 of this title; and (7)termination of a confirmed plan by reason of the occurrence of a condition specified in the plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.