Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

18 Cal. 416

Young v. Emerson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1861

California Supreme Court · decided 1861-07-01

' Ejectment for part of the Rancho Posolmi in Santa Clara. Plaintiff relied on a grant by Micheltorena, Mexican Governor, to Yñigo in 1844, with final confirmation by metes and bounds to plaintiff’s testator, Robert Walkinshaw. On the trial, plaintiff offered in evidence a copy of the grant and expediente from the United States Surveyor General’s office, defendant excepting, on various grounds not essential to be noticed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1961

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1861-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

¶1Field, C. J. and Baldwin, J. concurring.

¶2This is an action of ejectment for part of the Rancho Posolmi, in Santa Clara county. The plaintiff relies for a recovery upon a grant from the Mexican Government, and a decree of confirmation by the United States Board of Land Commissioners. On the trial of the case, he introduced in evidence a copy of this decree, certified by the Surveyor General to be a correct copy thereof, as the same is on file,” etc. Its introduction was objected to, upon the ground of the insufficiency of the certificate, but we do not see in what particular the certificate is essentially defective. It shows that the copy is a correct copy of the whole decree, and this we regard as a sufficient compliance with the statute. It is not intended that the terms of the statute should be literally pursued.

¶3The only additional question arises upon the admission of evidence which could have had no effect upon the verdict of the jury. The error, if an error was committed, was therefore immaterial, and cannot be relied on as a ground of reversal.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

/18/cal/416 · .json · Public domain