Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 CAL2D 382 - Rice v. Schmid

Rice v. Schmid’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
5
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 9 Cal. 3d 731 - Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1973), Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co. (1953)

66 state decisions

18019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co. · Wise v. United States · Dyer Bros. I. Wks. v. Central I. Wks. · United States v. Burton Coal Co. · 70 Cal. App. 204 - Hanlon Drydock & Shipbuilding Co. v. G. W. McNear, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In states like California, however, which have code sections governing the matter of liquidated damages the courts cannot disregard the plain provisions of the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The decisions in this state do not require proof that actual damages would be extremely difficult to estimate, but only require that the parties have intended to provide for damages rather than for a penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Barrels Price per barrel 2,000 “Ravalli” brand wheat flour at....... $7.10 2,750 “Gold Cross” brand wheat flour at.... 7.65 1,250 “Isis” brand wheat flour at.......... 7.15”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.