Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Cal. 3d 371 - Hardie v. Eu

18 Cal. 3d 371 - Hardie v. Eu’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
3
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently November 2019 · most notably 48 Cal. 3d 805 - Calfarm Insurance v. Deukmejian (1989), 25 Cal. 3d 33 - Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior Court (1979)

11 federal appellate · 3 district · 76 state decisions

50019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Buckley v. Valeo · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Roth v. United States · Shelton v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the other hand, as the high court noted in Buckley , appropriate limitations on individual contributions remain a constitutionally valid means of dealing with undue influence by moneyed interests in the electoral process. ( Buckley, supra, at pp. 23-38 ....)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the restraints imposed are nonetheless justified as incidental to the promotion of a `substantial' or `compelling' governmental interest, unrelated to speech, and unattainable by means less intrusive upon First Amendment rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.