Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 CALAPP2D 275 - Burrows v. Burrows

Burrows v. Burrows’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 1962
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1962

19 state decisions

1101936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Firebaugh v. Burbank · Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co. · Andrus v. Smith · 28 Cal. App. 338 - Stohlman v. Martin · Graham v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the provisions of section 470 of the Code of Civil Procedure the trial court is invested with discretionary power to permit and even to order the pleadings of the parties to be amended at any stage of the trial of the cause, and even after its submission, so as to make such pleadings conform to the proofs; and it has been uniformly held that this discretion will not be interfered with upon appeal except in cases of its manifest abuse.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.