Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 CALAPP2D 291 - In Re Davis

In Re Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2009

10 state decisions

3019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Kirby · People v. Ventura Refining Co. · San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stevinson · Matter of Application of Ahart · Robbiano v. Bovet

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ourts are [not] always to be governed by the exact phraseology and literal meaning of every word or phrase employed. . . . [C]ourts will not blindly follow the letter of a law, when its purpose is apparent, to consequences which are inconsistent with that purpose; and this would seem to be particularly true when the results of a literal interpretation, if adopted, would be absurd. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.