Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 Cal. App. 2d 366 - Wilhelm v. Rush

18 Cal. App. 2d 366 - Wilhelm v. Rush’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Newman v. Freitas · 68 Cal. App. 134 - Ayres v. Lipschutz · 115 Cal. App. 353 - Theisen v. Keough · 102 Cal. App. 413 - Harris v. Moore · Parsons v. Segno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`tend[] ... to prevent or impede the due course of justice'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.