Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 CALAPP2D 600 - Pedro v. Soares

Pedro v. Soares’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1987 · most notably 83 Cal. App. 2d 153 - King v. Mortimer (1948), 244 Cal. App. 2d 696 - Stearns v. Los Angeles City School District (1966)

26 state decisions

100193719401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brownrigg v. Defrees · Suhr v. Lauterbach · Vickrey v. Maier · Nathan v. Dierssen · 121 Cal. App. 639 - Wright v. Salzberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““He [the creditor] may bring an action in equity to set aside the fraudulent conveyance and subject the property to the satisfaction of his judgment lien, in which ease the action is not one on the judgment but it is an equitable one for relief against the obstruction caused by the fraudulent transfer which hinders him in satisfying his claim by the ordinary process of law, or ... he may bring an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill for the purpose of subjecting to the payT ment of his judgment, the money or property transferred or concealed in fraud of his rights.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘An action for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake. ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.