18 Cal. App. 3d 698 - Reida v. Lund’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably 9 Cal. App. 4th 88 - Jacoves v. United Merchandising Corp. (1992), 67 Cal. App. 3d 1012 - Pepper Industries, Inc. v. Home Ins. Co. (1977)
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 5 Cal. 3d 153 - Vesely v. Sager · Kuhns v. Brugger · Hergenrether v. East · 66 Cal. 2d 373 - R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. Allen · 44 Cal. 2d 310 - Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is held to the highest standard of due care * * *, even a slight deviation from which may constitute negligence in the safeguarding of such a dangerous instrument * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Volpe v. Gallagher“such an act of a third party, whether innocent, negligent, intentionally tortious or criminal does not prevent that person from being liable for the harm caused thereby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Volpe v. Gallagher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.