Weinstein v. Weinstein’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
75 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably 25 Conn. App. 41 - Graham v. Graham (1991), Wolf v. Wolf (1995)
75 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Neal v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · State v. Asherman · Weiman v. Weiman · Gallo v. Gallo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court has the opportunity to view the parties first hand and is therefore in the best position to assess the circumstances surrounding a dissolution action, in which such personal factors as the demeanor and attitude of the parties are so significant. Leo v. Leo, 197 Conn. 1 , 4 , 495 A.2d 704 (1985); Tutalo v. Tutalo, 187 Conn. 249 , 251 , 445 A.2d 598 (1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The purpose of alimony pendente lite is to provide support to a spouse who the court determines requires financial assistance pending the dissolution litigation and the ultimate determination of whether that spouse is entitled to an award of permanent alimony. Weinstein v. Weinstein , 18 Conn. App. 622 , 639-40 , 561 A.2d 443 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“professionally acquainted with the science or practice in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.