Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 DEL 586 - Daniels v. State

Daniels v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2008

10 state decisions

3019011910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We think that it [good character] is something more than 'a mere make weight in doubtful cases;' and that proof of an unblemished character may, under all the facts and circumstances of the particular case, create a doubt in the minds of the jury, when without it they would have no doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “seems to apply with peculiar force to decisions which have determined questions respecting real property and vested rights, and it embraces as well those matters of general commercial importance which tend to influence future business transactions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “together with the other facts and circumstances of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.