Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 F.1d 584 - Frazee v. Moffitt

Frazee v. Moffitt’s Empirical Analysis

18 F. 584 · 1882

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 1973
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 1973

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601882189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on James Converse v. Benjamin Burgess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Many articles are properly called raw which have undergone some manipulation. Cotton is picked from the bolls, and cleaned by ginning, and baled. Yet it is raw cotton in the bale. Wheat is cut, and the grains are threshed out, and then subjected to .a cleaning machine, and then bagged. Yet it is raw wheat in the bag. So with other grains. The cotton and the grains undergo such change and preparation as exposure to light, and natural or artificial heat, and air, and the manipulation they receive, produce or allow, bo it more or less. Yet neither the cotton nor the grains would, be said to bo manufactured. Salt and sugar are new articles. Cotton and grains are the same articles they were when on the plant with its roots in the earth. So hay is the same article it was when it was stalks of grass with roots in the earth. It is dried, to be sure; but the drying and any conversion of starch into sugar are mere incidents of the necessary cutting to enable it to he stored for food in latitudes where grass cannot be found all the year around. Where it can be so found, no hay is stored. Dried apples would not be called a manufactured article, though the apple is peeled and cored and sliced, and dried by exposure to the sun and manipulation. The substance of dried apples is still apples. The substance of dried grass or hay is still grass. Change of name and manipulation do not necessarily constitute manufacture, within the meaning of section 2510. Each case must be decided according to”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““That hay is a new article, trails formed from grass, as much as sugar is from tlie cane juice or the maple sap, or as salt is from the saline brine, and Unit the heat of the sun, and the air, and human skill and labor, manufacture the grass into hay.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.