Smith v. United States

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1927.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1927-02-21

3 counsel of record

Relies on Hardie v. New York Harbor Dry Dock Corp. · The Saratoga

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1927-02-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1955

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2 *112Austin & Abruzzo, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Vine H. Smith, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

¶3E. C. Sherwood, of New York City (William L. O’Brion, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee Brady & Gioe.

¶4Emory it. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Walker Schaffner, Sp. Asst. U. S; Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for other appellees.

¶5Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7Decree (18 F.[2d] 110) affirmed, without costs, under The Saratoga (C. C. A.) 94 F. 221, and Hardie v. New York, etc., Co. (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 545.