Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 F.2d 184 - Bailey v. Scott

Bailey v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

18 F.2d 184 · 1927

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1965
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. Darrington · McCurley v. McCurley · Zoellner v. Zoellner · Shafer v. Shafer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The order denying appellant’s application for counsel fees from which this appeal was taken, was made after the divorce suit had abated because of the plaintiff’s decease. Accordingly there was no ‘suit for divorce’ then pending, and the court consequently was without authority to enter an order against the defendant for suit money in the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.