Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 F.2d 448 - In re Paul

In re Paul’s Empirical Analysis

18 F.2d 448 · 1926

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
August 1967
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1967

4 federal appellate ·

3019261930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on District of Columbia v. Armes · New York Evening Post Co. v. Chaloner · Czarecki v. Seattle & San Francisco Railway & Navigation Co. · Tiffany v. United States · Lanier v. . Bryan

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.