United States v. Gary’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 1123 · 1994
Citation profile
47 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably United States v. Bolden (2003), United States v. Singh (1995)
47 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 876
Relies on Nicholas v. United States · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Kashif v. United States · Joseph v. United States · Calder v. Job
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f the offense caused property damage or loss not taken into account within the guidelines, the court may increase the sentence above the authorized guideline range.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“must have initially chosen [Nikki] because of her particular vulnerability.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Any acts that evidence an intent to carry out the threats on which a conviction is predicated, whether committed prior to or following such threats, may form the basis of the § 2A6.1(b)(1) adjustment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.