United States v. Bean’s Empirical Analysis
18 F.3d 1367 · 1994
Citation profile
48 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably United States v. Gomez (1994), United States v. Rosalez-Cortez (1994)
48 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on Williams v. United States · United States v. Carey · United States v. Bonnett · United States v. Seacott · United States v. Lallemand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether a defendant qualifies under subsection (a), appropriate considerations include, but are not limited to, the following: voluntary payment of restitution prior to adjudication of guilt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[m]ore than minimal planning' is deemed present in any case involving repeated acts over a period of time, unless it is clear that each instance was purely opportune.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“willingness to adhere to political society's laws”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.