Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 18 F.3d 1419 - Stock v. Share

Stock v. Share’s Empirical Analysis

18 F.3d 1419 · 1994

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Donatelli v. Home Insurance · Oldenburger v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Teamster Pension Fund

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless the benefit plan gives the administrator or fiduciary discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits or to construe the terms of the plan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.